Political commentary by Bill Press

June 21, 2004

No Al-Qaida Connection Equals No Justification For War
What's the worse thing a president could do? Get drunk on the job? Divert millions of dollars into his own pockets? Prance around naked on the Truman Balcony?

That's pretty bad. But there's something a whole lot worse. The worst thing a president could do is take this country to war on false pretenses. Yet that's exactly what George W. Bush has done.

No doubt, the Iraqi people are a lot better off with Saddam Hussein in prison and out of power. He was a brutal tyrant. He was so evil that, perhaps, President Bush might have convinced the American people of the need to invade Iraq for humanitarian reasons alone.

Except he didn't. Bush never made that argument. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz even admitted after the war that Saddam's criminal treatment of the Iraqi people "was a reason to help the Iraqis, but it's not a reason to put American kids' lives at risk, certainly not on the scale we did it."
Instead, President Bush offered what he said were four compelling reasons for going to war. First, that Iraq possessed stockpiles of biological and chemical weapons that had been moved to the front lines for use against our troops. Second, that Iraq was reconstituting its supply of nuclear weapons. Third, that Iraq posed an immediate, serious threat to the United States.

As documented before in this column, there is zero evidence to support those claims. Every one of them proved to be untrue. There were no weapons of mass destruction, no nuclear weapons. And with no navy, no long-range missiles, a rag-tag army, only a handful of planes and 60 percent of its territory controlled by U.S. and British fighter jets, the idea that Iraq was a threat to the United States is laugh-out-loud funny.

But the fourth reason Bush gave was the most powerful of all: that Saddam Hussein was directly linked to al-Qaida and therefore partly responsible for the horror of Sept. 11. During the build-up to the war, that was an argument made repeatedly by President Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell. It's a charge repeated just days ago by Vice-President Dick Cheney: "He had long-established ties to al-Qaida."

Baloney. According to the staff report of the 9/11 Commission, based on interviews with former top al-Qaida lieutenants and released on July 16 in Washington, there was "no collaborative relationship" between Iraq and al-Qaida. And again: "We have no credible evidence that Iraq and al-Qaida cooperated on attacks against the United States."

What about that alleged meeting in Prague between 9/11 mastermind Mohammed Atta and a senior Iraqi official, still cited by Cheney as proof that Hussein and bin Laden were partners in crime? It never happened, the commission concluded. According to the CIA, Atta was actually in Virginia and Florida when the meeting supposedly took place.

Were there contacts between Iraq and al-Qaida? Yes, the commission reports. Iraq was one of many Arab countries from which bin Laden sought support in building his terrorist network - even though, at the time, he was also arming anti-Saddam forces in the Kurdish region of Iraq.

A senior Iraqi official met with bin Laden in Sudan, where al-Qaida's founder asked for arms and permission to establish training camps in Iraq. But - and here's the key - Hussein turned him down. There was no al-Qaida presence in Iraq and no Iraqi support for their operations.

But how about terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi? According to the commission, he did travel in and out of Iraq during recent years. But he only moved to Iraq and began directing terrorist attacks against American troops after Hussein had been removed from power.

So why do Bush and Cheney continue to assert the Iraq-al-Qaida connection when there was none? For one very simple reason: It is the very cornerstone of the president's war platform. Without an al-Qaida link, there is no connection to Sept. 11. Without a connection to Sept. 11, there is no way to portray the war in Iraq as part of the continuing war on terror. Without ties between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden, there is no justification for the war in Iraq.

President Bush's entire case for war has fallen apart. He must now be held responsible for misleading us into an unnecessary war.
- - -
Bill Press is a political commentator for MSNBC. His new Web site is: www.billpress.com. His e-mail address is: bill@billpress.com.

© 2004 Tribune Media Services, Inc.

Paid for by the California Democratic Party
1401 21st Street, Suite 100, Sacramento CA 95814
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate committee.

Back to Groups and Official Viewpoints Page

 

   

This website is volunteer managed, designed and donated. Content is the sole responsibility of Democrats of Napa Valley Club.

Democrats of Napa Valley
Send mail to : DONV P.O. Box 206, Napa, CA 94559 Phone: 707-224-5700